Trinity
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
[please
click on one of the items above for more information]
============================================================
September 2002
(click here to return to "September 2002 Sermons" page)
26th Sunday in Ordinary Time (September 29, 2002)
“Hey!
What Are They Doing Here?” Dr. Julie Adkins
Text: Matthew 21:23-32
SERMON
As Matthew tells us,
Jesus addresses this parable to the chief priests
and Pharisees.
They’ve been up to their old tricks,
testing him once again,
trying to trip him up in his words,
so he’ll say something they can accuse him of,
and they can get rid of him once and for all.
As usual, Jesus can match them trick for trick …
He neatly evades the trap they have laid for him,
and then he tells them a parable
which turns out to be about themselves.
Two sons:
one whose words say no,
but his actions say yes;
another whose words say yes,
but his actions say no.
The religious leaders immediately agree, of course,
that it is the first one who did right.
And only when Jesus explains the story
does it become clear that it was a story about them
all along.
Here they were trying to condemn Jesus.
Instead they have condemned themselves.
Now, I’m quite sure that all of us know people
whose words and actions don’t match …
In fact, if we’re at all truthful,
we know that even we ourselves sometimes fall into
that category!
It’s one of our favorite national spectator sports
to catch politicians at it … !
but all of us, sometimes,
say one thing and then live just the opposite.
The sort of thing that Ralph Waldo Emerson was talking about
when he said to one of his friends,
“What you are doing is making so much
noise
that I cannot hear what you are saying.”
Or to put it another way:
sometimes, not only do our actions speak louder
than our words;
they may go so far as to drown out the words
altogether!
Now. most of us have probably not
ever sinned
quite as spectacularly or as publicly
as some of those whose failing we see broadcast on
the news …
but we all struggle continually with
making our words and our deeds match up.
Let me be clear:
I’m not talking – today – about those times
when the way is not clear,
and we aren’t sure what we ought to do.
No, I mean the times when we know the right thing to do,
but we don’t do it.
When we have the best of intentions,
but sometimes don’t follow through on them.
When we know the words of our prayers,
our hymns, our affirmations of faith, our
scriptures …
but often, we leave those words here in the church
building
and we don’t take them home with us.
Much of the time, we in the church –
and those of you who are visiting us today,
you’ll have to decide whether this is true for
you or not,
but I know it’s true for those of us
who
have been in this church or any church for any length of time
-- we become a little like those chief priests and
Pharisees.
We’ve studied the Bible,
we’ve listened to – or at least sat in the same
room with –
hundreds of sermons,
and so we are pretty good at knowing the right
answers.
If Jesus came in here today and told us a parable,
we’re pretty sure we’d guess right about what
he was getting at.
But what’s alarmingly easy to forget is that
we not only have to know the right answers;
we have to live them.
It isn’t enough to know the words;
in fact, that’s the easy part.
If the right words are all that we think we need,
we very quickly become complacent in our knowledge;
we come to believe we are sufficient unto
ourselves.
And when that happens,
we’ve turned ourselves into those chief priests
and Pharisees
who didn’t think they needed Jesus,
either.
They knew the Law;
what did they need with an itinerant teacher,
much less a savior?
I often hear good church folks wonder the same thing:
what does it really mean,
Jesus died for my sins?
I’m not that bad a person.
Surely he didn’t have to do that.
It must have been someone else’s sins that he was
worried about.
Woe to those of us who think we are righteous,
for we may be in for a big surprise.
Truth of the matter is,
we need to think about how we can be
a lot less like the chief priests and
Pharisees,
and a lot more like
the tax collectors and harlots.
Not in our choice of profession …!
but in our attitude toward the gospel
and toward Jesus himself.
Of course, one might say that at the outset,
the tax collectors and harlots were less
righteous
than the Pharisees and the chief priests.
The difference is, they knew something was wrong.
They were all too aware of their own unrighteousness,
their unacceptability.
It’s just that,
until the coming of John the Baptist, and then
Jesus,
no one had ever given them a clue
that things could be any different.
That their future did not have to be
weighted down by their past.
That present-day problems in their lives
didn’t have to keep them separated from God.
So that when God’s word came to them,
they heard it willingly;
they were open to it;
in fact, they were starving for it.
They believed,
and they repented.
And so, even though they had spent
most of their lives saying “no” to God’s
word,
like that first son in the parable –
or at least, that’s how they appeared to the
religious leaders –
in the end, like that first son,
they thought better of it,
and did the will of their “father,” of God.
So they really were just the opposite of those religious
folks,
who had said “yes” to God their whole lives
long,
but had never actually done anything about it.
Who are going to get a big surprise when
they arrive at the kingdom of heaven,
and find that the welcoming committee
is made up of moneygrabbers and ladies of the evening.
C. S. Lewis wrote a book
that deals in part with this issue …
It’s called The Great Divorce –
and if you haven’t read it, you should; it’s
skinny –
It’s about a busload of people
who make a journey from hell to heaven.
Turns out it was a dream, but that’s beside the point for
the moment.
Anyway, when the travelers from hell arrive in heaven,
each one of them is invited to stay by someone who
is already there,
someone they knew in this, earthly life.
Most of them find an excuse not to stay.
The encounter I want to share with you
happens between one of the visitors from hell,
referred to as “the ghost” or “the big
ghost,”
and the Spirit who welcomes him.
That Spirit happens to be a man
who worked for the “ghost” on earth,
and who had once murdered a man they both knew:
“Well, I’m damned,” said the Ghost.
“I wouldn’t have believed it. It’s
a fair knockout. It isn’t right,
Len, you know. What about poor
Jack, eh? You look pretty pleased
with yourself, but what I say is, What about poor Jack?”
“He is here,” said the other.
“You will meet him soon, if you stay.”
“But you murdered him.”
“Of course I did.
It is all right now.”
“All right, is it?
All right for you, you mean. But
what about the poor chap himself, laying cold and dead?”
“But he isn’t.
I have told you, you will meet him soon.
He sent you his love.”
“What I’d like to understand,” said the
Ghost, “is what you’re here for, as pleased as Punch, you, a bloody
murderer, while I’ve been walking the streets down there and living in a place
like a pigsty all these years.”
“That is a little hard to understand at first.
But it is all over now. You
will be pleased about it presently. Till
then there is no need to bother about it.”
“No need to bother about it?
Aren’t you ashamed of yourself?”
“No. Not as you mean.
I do not look at myself. I
have given up myself. I had to, you
know, after the murder. That was
what did it for me. And that was
how everything began.”
“Personally,” said the Big Ghost with an
emphasis which contradicted the ordinary meaning of the word, “personally,
I’d have thought you and I ought to be the other way round.
That’s my personal opinion.”
“Very likely we soon shall be,” said the other.
“If you’ll stop thinking about it.”
“Look at me, now,” said the Ghost, slapping its
chest (but the slap made no noise). “I
gone straight all my life. I
don’t say I was a religious man and I don’t say I had no faults, far from
it. But I done my best all my life,
see? I done my best by everyone,
that’s the sort of chap I was. I
never asked for anything that wasn’t mine by rights.
If I wanted a drink I paid for it and if I took my wages I done my job,
see? That’s the sort I was and I don’t care who knows it.”
“It would be much better not to go on about that
now.”
“Who’s going on?
I’m not arguing. I’m
just telling you the sort of chap I was, see?
I’m asking for nothing but my rights.
You may think you can put me down because you’re dressed up like that
(which you weren’t when you worked under me) and I’m only a poor man.
But I got to have my rights same as you, see?”
“Oh no. It’s
not so bad as that. I haven’t got
my rights, or I should not be here. You
will not get yours either. You’ll
get something far better. Never
fear.”
“That’s just what I say.
I haven’t got my rights. I
always done my best and I never done nothing wrong.
And what I don’t see is why I should be put below a bloody murderer
like you.”
“Who knows whether you will be?
Only be happy and come with me.”
“What do you keep on arguing for?
I’m only telling you the sort of chap I am.
I only want my rights. I’m
not asking for anybody’s bleeding charity.”
“Then do. At
once. Ask for the Bleeding Charity.
Everything is here for the asking and nothing can be bought.”
“That may be very well for you, I daresay.
If they choose to let in a bloody murderer all because he makes a poor
mouth at the last moment, that’s their lookout.
But I don’t see myself going in the same boat with you, see?
Why should I? I don’t want charity.
I’m a decent man and if I had my rights I’d have been here long ago
and you can tell them I said so.”
The other shook his head.
“You can never do it like that,” he said.
… “And it isn’t exactly true, you know.”
Mirth danced in his eyes as he said it.
“What isn’t true?” asked the Ghost sulkily.
“You weren’t a decent man and you didn’t do
your best. We none of us were and we none of us did.
Lord bless you, it doesn’t matter.
There is no need to go into it all now.”
“You!” gasped the Ghost.
“You have the face to tell me I wasn’t a decent
chap?”
“Of course.
Must I go into all that? I
will tell you one thing to begin with. Murdering
Jack wasn’t the worst thing I did. That
was the work of a moment and I was half mad when I did it.
But I murdered you in my heart, deliberately, for years.
I used to lie awake at nights thinking what I’d do to you if ever I got
the chance. That is why I have been
sent to you now: to ask your forgiveness and to be your servant as long as you
need one, and longer if it pleases you. I
was the worst. But all the men who worked under you felt the same.
You made it hard for us, you know. And
you made it hard for your wife too and for your children.”
“You mind your own business, young man,” said
the Ghost. “Non of your lip, see?
Because I’m not taking any impudence from you about my private
affairs.”
“There are no private affairs,” said the other.
“And I’ll tell you another thing,” said the
Ghost. “You can clear off, see?
You’re not wanted. I may
be only a poor man, but I’m not making pals with a murderer, let alone taking
lessons from him. Made it hard for
you and your like, did I? If I had
you back there I’d show you what work is.”
“Come and show me now,” said the other with
laughter in his voice. “It will
be joy going to the mountains, but there will be plenty of work.”
“You don’t suppose I’d go with you?”
“Don’t refuse.
You will never get there alone. And
I am the one who was sent to you.”
“So that’s the trick, is it?” shouted the
Ghost, outwardly bitter, and yet I thought there was a kind of triumph in its
voice. It had been entreated: it
could make a refusal: and this
seemed to it a kind of advantage. “I
thought there’d be some damned nonsense.
It’s all a clique, all a bloody clique.
Tell them I’m not coming, see? I’m
rather be damned than go along with you. I
came here to get my rights, see? Not
to go snivelling along on charity tied onto your apron-strings.
If they’re too fine to have me without you, I’ll go home.”
It was almost happy now that it could, in a sense, threaten.
“That’s what I’ll do,” it repeated, “I’ll go home.
I didn’t come here to be treated like a dog.
I’ll go home. That’s
what I’ll do. Damn and blast the
whole pack of you …” In the
end, still grumbling but whimpering also a little as it picked its way over the
sharp grasses. it made off.
(The Great
Divorce, pp. 32-36)
It makes one think, doesn’t it?
Who is there that I wouldn’t welcome sharing eternity with?
Or put another way,
is there anyone for whom I would truly say,
I’d rather be in hell
that be in heaven, if that person is there?
On some days, there probably are a few people on that
list.
But I need to be sure I understand that
that’s my problem;
it’s not God’s problem,
and it’s not that other person’s problem.
That is something we all have to work at from time to time,
any time we consider ourselves
to be better than someone else for whatever reason,
whether it’s a religious reason or something else entirely …
that is the Pharisee inside us talking;
it is not the voice of God.
And somehow we need to
get that Pharisee out, to exorcise him,
that self-righteous second son,
and to replace him with a heart
that is hungry for the word of God
and for a life lived in gratitude and obedience,
in community with others also seeking God’s word.
Sometimes that will require painful surgery:
to replace a hard heart with a new one!
But the kingdom of heaven is waiting,
not only in the future, but here and now …
And there is a place for each of us,
if we will only accept it.
God is calling to us.
How will we answer?
What will we do?
Amen.
©
2002 Julie Adkins (e-mail: DrJAdkins@trinitypresdallas.org)