Trinity
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
[please
click on one of the items above for more information]
============================================================
June 2002 (click here to return to "June
2002 Sermons" page)
13th Sunday in Ordinary Time (June 30, 2002)
“As
St. Teresa Once Said to God: . . .”
Dr. Julie Adkins
Text: Genesis 22:1-14
SERMON
“As St. Teresa
Once Said to God:
‘If this is how
you treat your friends,
it’s no wonder
you have so few of them.’”
The saga of
Abraham continues …
Last week, we saw
him casting out Hagar and Ishmael,
not one of his most admirable moments.
This week we have
come to a much more familiar story:
Abraham preparing to sacrifice Isaac, ostensibly at God’s command,
and only getting reprieved at the last possible minute.
Traditionally,
this has been viewed as one of Abraham’s most admirable moments,
though most of us also find it profoundly disturbing.
More about that in
a minute.
Again, Genesis is
giving us a confused chronology …
last week, just one chapter ago,
Isaac had just been weaned and so Abraham was throwing a party.
This week, just a
few verses later,
Isaac is at the very least an older child of age 10-11;
he might even be a young teenager of 13 or 14.
Either way, he’s
now old enough to have survived the usual
childhood dangers and diseases,
and could be reasonably expected to reach adulthood.
But what happens?
Our text tells us
that
“After these things, God tested Abraham.”
Uh-oh.
That’s never a
preface to good news, is it?!
God says to
Abraham,
“Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love,
and go to the land of Moriah,
and offer him there as a burnt offering
on
one of the mountains that I shall show you.”
Usually when God
wants something that Abraham doesn’t like,
Abraham feels free to argue.
Once or twice,
he’s even persuaded God to change the plan.
But this time, he
is silent.
No
protest, not even a request for explanation.
Abraham gets up
early in the morning,
saddles up his donkey,
takes two of the younger servant men with him,
for reasons that aren’t altogether clear,
gets Isaac to come along,
cuts a bunch of wood for the fire –
maybe that’s what the young men were for, to cut the wood or to carry
it –
and heads off toward the distant mountains.
I’ve often
wondered what Sarah had to say about all this,
but the text doesn’t tell us.
At any rate, we
know the rest of the story:
at the last possible moment, God tells Abraham to stop,
and provides an alternative sacrifice,
so that Isaac can go on and grow up, and marry Rebekah,
and become the father of Jacob and Esau,
and so on, and so on.
For all its
familiarity to most of us,
the story remains a strange one.
It is hard for us
to imagine that God –
at least, the God that we have come to know in Jesus Christ –
doing something as cruel and nonsensical as
promising Abraham a son all those years before,
and then appearing to be ready to snatch him away …
not to mention, making Abraham do the dirty work.
Various scholars
talk about this story being a kind of foreshadowing
of God’s willingness to sacrifice God’s own son, Jesus Christ;
and there’s probably some truth to that.
But the story also
stands on its own, strange though it be.
I do have
trouble with the notion
that God ordered Abraham to do this,
although an interesting connection occurred to me:
For the first
time, this year,
I noticed how close this story is to the one about Hagar and Ishmael.
Again, we don’t
know how close or far apart in time
the two events actually were …
but in terms of how the scriptures are laid out now,
they are almost right next to each other.
Abraham sends his first
son, Ishmael, away into the wilderness,
to certain death if God had not intervened …
Less than a
chapter later, we find God telling Abraham to take Isaac,
“your only son Isaac, whom you love,”
and to put him to death.
And only through
God’s intervention again is Isaac spared.
Was God trying to
tell Abraham something?
Trying
to give him a taste of the fear that he had caused Hagar?
To
show him what it would be like to lose your only child,
and to have to watch him die?
Did Abraham need a
direct demonstration
of the enormity of what he had done to his “other” family?
That’s still not
a very pretty picture of God,
but it would make the whole episode a little more understandable.
Abraham was
a stubborn servant of the Almighty.
Perhaps this was
the only way God could get through to him.
Or perhaps
Abraham’s own guilty conscience finally got the better of him,
and he persuaded himself that it was God’s command to slay Isaac,
when it was really only his own sense of guilt over
what he had done in the past.
That’s what
Sigmund Freud would tell you,
and he was at least partly right.
Granted,
we all do stupid things and wrong things from time to time,
but unless we are sociopaths without a conscience,
we tend to punish ourselves more for those things than God ever does.
There’s probably
a whole sermon in that,
but we’ll save it for another day.
Simply be aware
that it’s always possible that
God didn’t really tell Abraham to do such a horrible thing.
What matters,
though, and why the story is here in the first place,
is that Abraham believed that God had told him what to do.
And that,
therefore, even though the command made no sense at all,
he never questioned that he should do it.
Isaac is
Abraham’s only heir,
so it has to be through him that Abraham’s descendants are going to
become
as numerous as the sands on the shore …
so if he kills Isaac, there’s not even one grain of sand left,
much less the whole beach …
Nevertheless,
Abraham doesn’t argue.
Doesn’t say – excuse me, I left home at your command
more than thirty-five years ago, and this is the thanks I get?!
Doesn’t say – you know, Lord, I’m a hundred and ten years old;
do you suppose you could let me slow down just a little?!
Doesn’t
say – now let me get this straight:
I’m supposed to kill this son,
and Sarah is going to get pregnant again now that she’s over 100?!
He just makes his
preparation and goes.
Which is what
brought to my mind
the somewhat bizarre title of this sermon.
I don’t remember
exactly what was going on in St. Teresa’s life at the moment –
of course, she wasn’t yet “St.” Teresa,
but was already recognized as a godly woman.
Anyway, whatever
the specifics were, things weren’t going well,
and with gentle good humor she commented to God,
“If this is how you treat your friends,
it’s no wonder you have so few of them.”
Abraham could
easily have made the same claim:
if this is how you treat people who have said yes to your call,
and have spent decades at least trying to live faithfully,
then it’s no wonder that there are so few of us.
There are no doubt
days when we ourselves feel much the same way.
It happens at
times in our personal lives,
when, for example, an illness lays us low,
and we don’t seem able to recover properly
and God doesn’t seem to be available to heal us.
Or, when we lose
several loved ones all at once, it seems,
and wonder, doesn’t God know how much I’m hurting already?
If this is how you
treat those of us who have tried to be your friends,
it’s no wonder there are so few of us around …?
It’s even more
important, though,
for us to look at Abraham and St. Teresa and ourselves corporately,
as a body of God’s faithful.
Because we are the
descendants of Isaac –
at least, in terms of our faith story –
we are in a way by definition the “friends of God,”
we are numbered among the insiders.
And just as last
week’s story about Ishmael reminded us
that God is active in the lives even of “outsiders,”
those who haven’t been a part of the story as we know it …
and that God makes and keeps promises to people
different from ourselves, and strange to us …
So this
week’s story brings us back to the perspective of the “insiders”
and tells us that God indeed does not always
take all the bumps out of the road for us,
or rescue us from our own messes,
or set us in a comfy chair with riches at our command.
If anything, God
seems to expect more
from those of us who are and have been the “insiders”;
those who have known and served God for a long time.
Ishmael was not
part of the covenant as we know it,
yet God blessed him and made his descendants numerous …
Abraham and Isaac were
an integral part of God’s covenant players,
and yet they struggled, their descendants struggled.
We could argue
about whether God caused all those challenges for them,
or simply didn’t rescue them when problems arose;
but either way, being among the chosen people
didn’t make life any easier!
Sometimes it
seemed to make things harder.
And it didn’t
mean that they weren’t being faithful,
or that God had ceased to love them.
It meant that
being a child of God is a vocation, a calling;
not a retirement plan!
It also
means – and this is where the life of faith gets difficult –
that God expects more of us than God does of those
who aren’t on God’s “friends” list.
In a way, that
makes sense.
We feel much more
free to ask favors of our human friends
than we do of strangers.
In times of great
need,
we may even make demands on our friends,
knowing that in the future,
we will allow them to make demands on us.
Sometimes, though,
God asks of us things that don’t seem to make sense.
Abraham, take this
child and sacrifice him on the mountain I will show you.
Not only is that cruel,
it doesn’t even make sense in light of other things God has said
before!
How can God
contradict God’s self?
Your descendants are going to be numerous …
Kill the only descendant you have.
Likewise, God may
ask of us things
which seem at first to make no sense at all.
Which may seem to
contradict other things that God said at other times.
Which may seem to
contain within them the seed of their own destruction.
Or which may
simply seem too difficult, if not impossible, for us to undertake.
Does that mean
that God has become displeased with us,
or is testing us,
or has taken us off the “A” list of divine friends?
No, if anything it
probably means just the opposite.
High expectations is
how God treats God’s friends.
Which may be why there are so few of them,
but which is also why it’s so important for us to keep paying
attention.
As we, and many
congregations, wrestle with what our future will be,
we need, in the first place, to recognize that
our current difficulties don’t necessarily mean that we’ve been
unfaithful.
They might
mean that,
but the truth is, I see a lot more “success” in worldly terms
in churches where the gospel message is watered down and prettied up.
Struggles may
mean that we have been faithful
in a world where being faithful is difficult and therefore unpopular.
But the struggles
may also mean, in addition,
that God is now calling us forward into something new
that so far seems illogical to us, or even nonsensical,
or at best difficult,
and so we are having a hard time seeing that it is indeed God
who is issuing that call.
It may seem that
we are being asked to slay something that is important to us,
and that we thought was important to God,
without having a clear sense of what comes after.
It is hard
to respond obediently to God in the present,
when God hasn’t yet told us how that fits in with the future.
And yet, that is
our calling as heirs to the “inside” of the faith tradition.
It is our vocation
as the friends of God.
To be faithful
even when there are no visible rewards,
and even when we can’t see where it leads.
Perhaps it is no
wonder that God has few friends …
but I can’t imagine wanting to exchange that privilege for anything.
Can you?
Amen.